Quick Search:       Advanced Search
Chinese Version 
Online office
Journal Online
Download
Top
Links

扫描微信二维码,获取更多信息
Quality Assessment of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Integrative Medicine in China: A Systematic Review
  
View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
KeyWord:clinical practice guideline, Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation Ⅱ, quality assessment
Author NameAffiliationE-mail
YAO Sha, Wei Dang, CHEN Yao-long   
LI Hui Department of Standardization, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong (510120), China lihuitcm@126.com 
Hits: 1067
Download times: 0
Abstract:
      Objective: To assess the quality of integrative medicine clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) published before 2014. Methods: A systematic search of the scientific literature published before 2014 was conducted to select integrative medicine CPGs. Four major Chinese integrated databases and one guideline database were searched: the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP), Wanfang Data, and the China Guideline Clearinghouse (CGC). Four reviewers independently assessed the quality of the included guidelines using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) Ⅱ Instrument. Overall consensus among the reviewers was assessed using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: A total of 41 guidelines published from 2003 to 2014 were included. The overall consensus among the reviewers was good [ICC: 0.928; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.920 to 0.935]. The scores on the 6 AGREE domains were: 17% for scope and purpose (range: 6% to 32%), 11% for stakeholder involvement (range: 0 to 24%), 10% for rigor of development (range: 3% to 22%), 39% for clarity and presentation (range: 25% to 64%), 11% for applicability (range: 4% to 24%), and 1% for editorial independence (range: 0 to 15%). Conclusions: The quality of integrative medicine CPGs was low, the development of integrative medicine CPGs should be guided by systematic methodology. More emphasis should be placed on multi-disciplinary guideline development groups, quality of evidence, management of funding and conflicts of interest, and guideline updates in the process of developing integrative medicine CPGs in China.
Close