Quick Search:       Advanced Search
Chinese Version 
Online office
Journal Online
Download
Top
Links

扫描微信二维码,获取更多信息
Relation of Blood Arsenic Concentration with Effect and Safety of Arsenic-Containing Qinghuang Powder (青黄散) in Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndrome
  
View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
KeyWord:myelodysplastic syndrome, realgar, arsenic, Qinghuang Powder, Chinese medicine
Author NameAffiliationE-mail
DENG Zhong-yang, ZHU Shi-rong, WANG Ming-jing   
HU Xiao-mei Department of Hematology, Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing (100091), China huxiaomei_2@163.com 
Hits: 964
Download times: 0
Abstract:
      Objective: To investigate the relation of blood arsenic concentration (BAC) with clinical effect and safety of arsenic-containing Qinghuang Powder (青黄散, QHP) in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Methods: Totally 163 patients with MDS were orally treated with QHP for 2 courses of treatment, 3 months as 1 course. The BACs of patients were detected by atomic fluorescence spectrophotometry at 1, 3, and 6 months during the treatment, and the effective rate, hematological improvement and safety in patients after treatment with QHP were analyzed. Results: After 2 courses of treatment, the total effective rate was 89.6% (146/163), with 31.3% (51/163) of hematological improvement and 58.3% (95/163) of stable disease. The hemoglobin increased from 73.48± 19.30 g/L to 80.39± 26.56 g/L (P<0.05), the absolute neutrophil count increased from 0.81± 0.48× 109/L to 1.08± 0.62× 109/L (P<0.05), and no significant changes were observed in platelet counts (P>0.05). Among 46 patients previously depended on blood transfusion, 28.3% (13/46) completely got rid of blood transfusion and 21.7% (10/46) reduced the volume of blood transfusion by more than 50% after treatment. The BACs were significantly increased in patients treated for 1 month with 32.17± 18.04 μ g/L (P<0.05), 3 months with 33.56± 15.28 μ g/L (P<0.05), and 6 months with 36.78± 11.92 μ g/L (P<0.05), respectively, as compared with those before treatment (4.08± 2.11 μ g/L). There were no significant differences of BACs among the patients treated for 1, 3 and 6 months (P>0.05). The adverse reactions of digestive tract during the treatment were mild abdominal pain and diarrhea in 14 cases (8.6%), and no patients discontinued the treatment. The BACs of patients with gastrointestinal adverse reactions were significantly lower than those without gastrointestinal adverse reactions (22.39± 10.38 vs. 37.89± 11.84, μ g/L, P<0.05). The BACs of patients with clinical effect were significantly higher than those failed to treatment (40.41± 11.69 vs. 23.84± 12.03, μ g/L, P<0.05). Conclusion: QHP was effective and safe in the treatment of patients with MDS and the effect was associated with BACs of patients.
Close