李国贤,鄢毅,袁景珊,李晴,李冰芳.血瘀证目征与血瘀证诊断标准的比较研究[J].中国中西医结合杂志,1995,(8):472-475 |
血瘀证目征与血瘀证诊断标准的比较研究 |
Comparative Study of Diagnostic Standards of Eye-Signs in Blood Stasis Syndrome and of Blood Stasis Syndrome |
免费下载全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
|
DOI: |
中文关键词: 血瘀证目征 血瘀证诊断标准 |
英文关键词:Blood Stasis Syndrome eye signs diagnostic standards of blood stasis syndrome |
基金项目: |
|
摘要点击次数: 1397 |
全文下载次数: 941 |
中文摘要: |
通过6种标准对781例患者的诊断研究,提示在诊断阳性率、敏感度、特异度、假阳性率、假阴性率和总和积分值等方面,中国血瘀证诊断标准和国际血瘀证诊断标准最优,血瘀证目征和日本瘀血证诊断标准次之,国际瘀血诊断标准试行方案和中山氏瘀血压痛点更次之。各种标准各有其独特优点,应相互取长补短,同时,探讨了导致各种标准不足之处的原因,并提出合理建议。 |
英文摘要: |
By virtue of a diagnostic study of 781 cases on the basis of six standards,it was shown that for the effectiveness in diagnostic positive rate,sensitivity,specificity,false positive rate,false negative rate and comprehensive scoring,the International Diagnostic Standards for Blood Stasis Syndrome(BSS) and Chinese Diagnostic Standards for BSS were the best ones,BSS Eye-Signs and Japanese BSS Diagnostic Standards were the second,trial program of International Stasis Diagnostic Standards and Zhongshan’s BSS tenderness points came the third.Each standard has its unique advantage and therefore,we should take the other’s advantage to offset one’s weakness.The causes of their weakness have been discussed and the rational recommendation for their application has been proposed. |
关闭 |
|
|
|