快速检索:        
    
在线办公系统
在线期刊
下载专区
排行榜
友情链接
扫描微信二维码,获取更多信息
段鑫,周礼鲲,吴泰相,刘关键.中医药治疗冠心病的临床随机对照试验文献的质量分析[J].中国中西医结合杂志,2003,(3):164-167
中医药治疗冠心病的临床随机对照试验文献的质量分析
Quality Analysis of Literatures on Clinical Randomized Controlled Trial of Coronary Heart Diseases Treated with TCM
免费下载全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
  
DOI:
中文关键词:  冠心病  临床随机对照试验  文献质量分析
英文关键词:coronary heart disease  clinical randomized controlled trial  quality analysis of literature
基金项目:
作者单位
段鑫 川大学华西医院国际临床流行病学培训中心
四川大学华西医院国际临床流行病学教研室
中国循证医学中心 
周礼鲲 川大学华西医院国际临床流行病学培训中心
四川大学华西医院国际临床流行病学教研室
中国循证医学中心 
吴泰相 川大学华西医院国际临床流行病学培训中心
四川大学华西医院国际临床流行病学教研室
中国循证医学中心 
刘关键 川大学华西医院国际临床流行病学培训中心
四川大学华西医院国际临床流行病学教研室
中国循证医学中心 
摘要点击次数: 1902
全文下载次数: 2334
中文摘要:
      目的:评价中医药治疗冠心病的临床随机对照试验(RCT)文献的质量。方法:手工检索83种中医类杂志(1977—2002年6月)。纳入标准:中医药治疗冠心病的临床随机对照试验。结果:符合纳入标准的文献共675篇。(1)交待了随机分配方法的58篇(8.59%);(2)提到了诊断标准及研究纳入标准的637篇(94.37%);(3)无一篇提到分配隐匿;(4)使用了盲法的64篇(9.48%),采用双盲的29篇(4.29%),单盲的35篇(5.19%);(5)提到基线可比性的563篇(83.41%);(6)无一篇提到样本含量的估算依据;(7)12个临床研究中病人有丢失,但无一在结果统计中进行intention-to-treat处理;(8)统计方法错误的24篇,占3.56%;有统计结果但没有说明方法的394篇,占58.37%。结论:迄今为止临床随机对照实试在有关中医药治疗冠心病的研究中还没有被广泛运用。我们在这一领域的临床随机对照实验中还很难见到分配隐匿,样本的估算依据,盲法与intention-to-treat的运用。一些文章还混淆了随机分配与随机抽样的概念。正确的统计学方法的运用率还比较低。总的看来,中医药治疗冠心病的RCT试验文献的质量亟待提高。
英文摘要:
      Objective: To assess the quality of literatures on clinical randomized controlled trial of coronary heart diseases (CHD) treated with TCM. Methods: Literatures of clinical randomized controlled trial of CHD treated with TCM, published in 83 Journals of TCM from 1977 to June 2002, were retrieved manually. Results: In the 675 articles that conformed to the including criteria, the method of randomized control was declared in 58 articles (8.59%), including and diagnostic criteria declared in 637 (94.37%), allocation concealment in none, baseline comparability in 563 (83.41%), account evidence of sample size in none; double-blinded method was adopted in 29 (4.29 % ) and single-blinded in 35 (5.19 % ); abscondence occurred in 12 but intention-to-treat in none in the results; wrong statistical method was used in 24 (3. 56% ) and 394 (58.37% ) had statistical result but the method used was not mentioned. Conclusion: The clinical randomized controlled trial has not yet been used widely in studies of TCM treating CHD so far. Latent distribution, the reliance of estimation on the sample, blind method and the application of intention-to-treat are hardly seen extensively in clinical randomized controlled trial (RCT) in this field. The concept of randomized distribution and randomized sampling in some articles. The adopting rate of accurate statistical methods is quite low. Generally speaking, the quality of RCT literatures on TCM treating coronary heart diseases needs to be further improved.
关闭