快速检索:        
    
在线办公系统
在线期刊
下载专区
排行榜
友情链接
扫描微信二维码,获取更多信息
李东涛,凌昌全,朱德增,俞超芹,陈喆,翟笑枫,沈婕,张百红,张金峰,郎庆波.原发性肝癌中医常见基本证候轻重程度量化评价研究[J].中国中西医结合杂志,2007,(7):602-605
原发性肝癌中医常见基本证候轻重程度量化评价研究
Study on the Quantitative Evaluation on the Degree of TCM Basic Syndromes Often Encountered in Patients with Primary Liver Cancer
免费下载全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
  
DOI:
中文关键词:  原发性肝癌  中医证候  层次分析法  综合集成研讨厅体系
英文关键词:primary liver cancer  TCM syndrome  analytic hierarchy process  hall for work shop of metasynthetic engineering
基金项目:上海市科委重点资助项目(No.05JC14044);国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.90209018);上海市教育委员会E-研究院建设计划资助项目(No.E-03008)
作者单位
李东涛 济南军区青岛第一疗养院 
凌昌全 第二军医大学长海医院中医科 
朱德增 第二军医大学长海医院中医科 
俞超芹 第二军医大学长海医院中医科 
陈喆 第二军医大学长海医院中医科 
翟笑枫 第二军医大学长海医院中医科 
沈婕 第二军医大学长海医院中医科 
张百红 第二军医大学长海医院中医科 
张金峰 第二军医大学长海医院中医科 
郎庆波 第二军医大学长海医院中医科 
摘要点击次数: 1506
全文下载次数: 2
中文摘要:
      目的构建原发性肝癌中医常见基本证候轻重程度量化评价模型。方法收集国内有关原发性肝癌症状与证候相关研究文献,以"综合集成研讨厅"专家研讨的方法,应用100mm刻度法结合症状轻重分级赋分法建立症状体征量化规范。以综合评价层次分析法作为证候量化评价的数学工具,组织专家对基本证候的各层次评价指标进行权重估计,构建两种基本证候轻重程度量化评价层次分析模型,即相加模型与相加相乘模型,通过临床验证,将这两种模型的量化计算结果与专家模糊判断结果进行比较。结果在对459例次原发性肝癌患者的临床验证结果表明,相加模型运算结果与专家模糊判断符合率为84.53%,相加相乘模型符合率为62.75%,两者比较差异有显著性(P<0.01)。结论确定相加模型为原发性肝癌基本证候轻重程度量化评价的基本模型。
英文摘要:
      Objective To establish a quantitative model for evaluating the degree of the TCM basic syndromes often encountered in patients with primary liver cancer(PLC).Methods Medical literatures concerning the clinical investigation and TCM syndrome of PLC were collected and analyzed adopting expert-composed symposium method,and the 100 millimeter scaling was applied in combining with scoring on degree of symptoms to establish a quantitative criterion for symptoms and signs degree classification in patients with PLC.Two models,i.e.the additive model and the additive-multiplicative model,were established by using comprehensive analytic hierarchy process(AHP)as the mathematical tool to estimate the weight of the criterion for evaluating basic syndromes in various layers by specialists.Then the two models were verified in clinical practice and the outcomes were compared with that fuzzy evaluated by specialists.Results Verification on 459 times/case of PLC showed that the coincidence rate between the outcomes derived from specialists with that from the additive model was 84.53%,and with that from the additive-multificative model was 62.75%,the difference between the two showed statistical significance(P<0.01).Conclusion It could be decided that the additive model is the principle model suitable for quantitative evaluation on the degree of TCM basic syndromes in patients with PLC.
关闭