Quick Search:         Advanced Search
Chinese Version
Online office
Journal Online
Download
Top
Links
唐凤英,胡随瑜,喻长远,谢雄伟.两种反向传播网络测试方法在抑郁症中医证型分类中的对比研究[J].,2006,(3):209-211
两种反向传播网络测试方法在抑郁症中医证型分类中的对比研究
Comparative Study on Two Methods of Back Propagation Network Test in TCM Syndrome Typing of Depression
  
DOI:
中文关键词:  反向传播网络  抑郁症  交叉训练测试法  Round-Robin法  中医证型分类
英文关键词:back propagation network  depression  cross train-test method  Round-Robin met hod  TCM syndrome typing
基金项目:国家“十五”科技攻关项目(No.2001BA701A22)
Author NameAffiliation
TANG Feng-ying 中南大学湘雅医院中西医结合研究所 长沙410008 
HU Sui-yu 中南大学湘雅医院中西医结合研究所 长沙410008 
YU Chang-yuan 中南大学湘雅医院中西医结合研究所 长沙410008 
谢雄伟 中南大学湘雅医院中西医结合研究所 长沙410008 
Hits: 1372
Download times: 3
中文摘要:
      目的比较两种反向传播(back propagation,BP)网络测试方法在抑郁症5种中医证型分类中的作用。方法(1)交叉训练测试法:将1731例抑郁症患者随机分成两组,轮流进行训练和测试。(2)Round-Robin法:从1731例抑郁症中抽取1例测试,1730例训练,测试完成后,该例患者加入训练集,从训练集中另取1例测试,如此循环更替,直至完成1731例样本的测试。结果BP网络两种测试方法训练总体敏感度分别为97.9%和98.2%,测试总体敏感度分别为72.7%及74.2%。结论(1)BP网络两种测试方法均能较好地区分抑郁症5种中医证型,在中医证型分类识别中有一定价值。(2)Round-Robin法敏感度略高于交叉训练测试法,但差异无显著性。
英文摘要:
      ObjectiveTo compare the effect of the two methods of back propagation network (BPN) test on TCM syndrome typing of depression. Methods Test was carried out by two methods as following: (1) Cross tr ain-test method: 1731 patients with depression typed to 5 syndrome types were randomly divided into 2 groups, and they were trained and tested in turn; (2) Round-Robin method: Test was conducted in an al t ered cycle mode, that is, in a cycle, one out of the 1731 patients were select ed to be tested, while the others were trained, the next cycle started when the test on the selected patient was finished and another one for test was sele cted. In this way, one cycle after the other, until all patients had been tested . Results The total training sensitivity of the two methods was 97.9% and 98.2% respectively, and the total testing sensitivity was 72.7 % and 74.2% respectively. Conclusion(1) The five TCM syndrome t ypes of depression could be well differentiated by BPN, which is valuable for TCM syndrome typing in certain extent; (2) The sensitivity of Round-Robin method is slightly higher than that of Cross train-te st method, but in comparison between them no remarkable significan ce was shown.
View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader